Ultra-Processed Foods, Real Life Budgets: How to Eat Well in a Cost-of-Living Crisis
Ultra-processed foods are once again being portrayed as the main villain in the nutrition world. The headlines are loud, the language is dramatic, and many people feel guilty, confused, or judged every time they open a packet of anything.
As a practitioner who works with real people in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis, this worries me. Not because ultra-processed foods are harmless – they’re not – but because the current conversation is often too black-and-white, and that can quietly do harm.
“Ultra-processed” is a technical classification, not a health verdict. It tells us how a food was made and what went into it, but not automatically whether it’s helpful, neutral, or problematic in a given context. That distinction really matters.
Let’s also be honest about the economic reality. Whole foods often do cost more upfront. Fresh berries, organic meat, or speciality gluten-free products are simply out of reach for many families right now. When you are choosing between paying the electricity bill or buying “perfect” ingredients, the stress of trying to eat healthy can become yet another burden. In that context, carefully chosen processed foods are not a moral failure; they are a survival strategy.
Not All Ultra-Processed Foods Are Equal
When people hear “ultra-processed,” they tend to picture the usual suspects: ultra-salted crisps, sweets, ultra-sweetened fizzy drinks, chicken nuggets, and cheap pastries. These are products designed to be over-eaten, easy to grab, and low in nutritional value. Eaten daily and in large amounts, they absolutely contribute to weight gain, inflammation, fatigue, and long-term disease risk.
But many foods that end up in the same “ultra-processed” box are very different in practice. Depending on the specific product, they can be helpful, pragmatic tools in a modern diet. Think of options like:
Fortified breads that add fibre and vitamins. It is important to note that “fortified” only means that the manufacturer has replaced the nutrients lost due to excessive processing with petroleum-based (often unusable by the body) vitamins.
Yoghurts with stabilisers but also live cultures and decent protein.
Plant-based milks that help people who can’t tolerate dairy. However, I urge you to make your own here. It makes more sense if you are on a budget. Making nut milk costs a fraction of the price of a carton (of a white liquid) and can be done in seconds, without any additives or thickeners like rice or corn starch, xanthan gum, etc. Most often, plant-based milk contains 6-12% of the final product. The rest is tap water, thickeners, and whitening agents to make it look like regular cows’ milk.
High-fibre cereals designed to support cholesterol and blood sugar. Although these refer to whole-grain cereals like rice, wheat, oats, and millet, and not breakfast cereals, they are only for children and young people.
Tinned beans or lentil soups with a short, sensible ingredients list.
Shop-bought hummus that makes vegetables more appealing and convenient. Organic versions often cost just a few cents more, and those nearer the use-by date may be heavily discounted. Great savings for large families.
Are these ideal compared to a perfectly home-cooked meal based solely on fresh ingredients? Not always.
Can they be helpful and realistic for a busy parent, a tired shift worker, or someone on a low income trying to do their best? Absolutely.
When Ultra-Processed Food Becomes a Problem
The real issue is not the existence of processed foods (UPFs). It’s the pattern: how often, how much, and what they are displacing. UPFs were designed for convenience, an easy pick for a busy day’s dinner. It was never intended to be the main alternative for everyday meals. The issue here is that many people choose convenience because any effort is too much, and cooking is seen as a time-consuming chore rather than a vital part of being a healthy human being. They may also protest that if UPFs were bad, they wouldn’t be in the shops. The complete disconnect between real food, UPF ingredients, and the human body is the real issue here.
Ultra-processed products cause the most harm when:
They displace almost all whole foods in the diet.
Portions are large and frequent (e.g., sugary drinks, pastries, takeaways most days), and they contain excessive amounts of salt, sugar, and pro-inflammatory ultra-refined cooking oils and highly questionable additives.
They are used to cope with emotions rather than as a source of nourishment (comfort eating for stress, boredom, loneliness).
There is very little cooking at home, and most meals are bought ready-made or delivered.
In children, the concern is less the occasional biscuit or sweet and more the overall pattern: constant snacking, low movement, very few vegetables or whole grains, regular sugary drinks, and large portions of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods.
This is where education and gentle guidance matter more than fear-mongering. Many parents were never taught how to cook simple meals, plan a basic food shop, or read a food label. Shaming them won’t fix that. Practical, respectful support might.
What About Kids’ Snacks and Sugar?
This is where nuance is really important. A healthy, active child with a mainly balanced diet can cope with some sugary snacks. Children typically burn energy more quickly – they move and fidget more, grow constantly, and have dynamic, adaptable bodies. A biscuit or a small sweet treat in a generally balanced context is not the enemy.
The bigger concern is when:
A child is mostly sedentary (lots of screens, minimal movement).
There is a constant stream of high-sugar, high-fat snacks throughout the day.
Meals are often beige, low in fibre and micronutrients, and high in refined carbohydrates and fats.
There is little structure – grazing all day rather than having defined mealtimes or family sit-down meals.
In that situation, it is not just the sugar in an occasional snack that is the problem. It is the whole routine around food, movement, and family habits.
For children who are already overweight or living with metabolic issues, or for adults in the same situation, we need a different, more intentional approach. That does not mean “no sugar ever” — extreme rules tend not to work — but it does mean:
Making sugary, ultra-processed snacks less frequent and more portion-controlled. If you find control difficult, do not fill your cupboard with snacks, so when you have finished one packet, you may be more likely to eat something fresh from the fridge or a fruit basket, that is, if you also buy healthy options (including nuts, yoghurt, fruits, and vegtables like carrots, peppers, celery and cucumber, all of which are great to snack on or dip in a yummy hummus or homemade tzatziki)
Prioritising filling foods (protein, fibre, healthy fats) so you feel satisfied and snack less.
Supporting parents to develop simple cooking skills and meal ideas that feel doable, even on a budget.
Blaming parents without offering tools, time-saving ideas, or acknowledging financial and emotional stress is neither fair nor practical.
The Cost-of-Living Crisis: Food Choice Under Pressure
Telling families to “just eat fresh whole foods” can be naïve and, frankly, tone-deaf. Rising food prices, high rent or mortgages, and low wages mean many households are forced to make very tough choices, especially if they have young kids at home. Many parents go without dinner to ensure their children go to bed with a full belly.
In that context, some ultra-processed foods are often:
Cheaper per calorie.
Longer lasting, so less food waste.
Quicker to prepare, which matters when parents are juggling multiple jobs or caregiving.
Instead of insisting on perfection, a more compassionate and realistic approach is to:
Make the best possible choice within your budget.
Use a mix of whole and processed foods thoughtfully.
Learn two or three simple, low-cost recipes you can rely on (e.g., Exquisite Private Chef “Easy Peasy” recipes)
Feel less guilt when you cannot afford the “ideal” version of everything.
For example, a family might not be able to buy organic produce or fresh fish weekly, but they can:
Buy frozen vegetables and fruits.
Choose tinned beans and lentils, which are cheap (even organic), filling, and versatile.
Pick wholemeal bread or higher-fibre options when possible.
Combine a budget-friendly ultra-processed item (like a fish finger) with vegetables and a simple side to create a more balanced meal.
This is not “perfect.” It is realistic progress — and that is often what builds long-term health.
The Hidden Risks of Demonising All UPFs
Oversimplifying the message “all ultra-processed foods are bad” can create several unintended consequences:
Food anxiety and disordered eating
When people start to fear every additive, label, or ingredient they don’t recognise, the joy and ease of eating disappear. Some become paralysed by rules, constantly second-guessing themselves. For people with a history of disordered eating or high anxiety, this can be particularly harmful.
Missing the fundamental drivers of poor health
It is easier to blame a single ingredient or category than to look at the bigger picture: chronic stress, poor sleep, loneliness, low physical activity, lack of support, and financial pressure. All of these interact with food choices and health. Restricting ultra-processed foods won’t fix a life that feels unmanageable.
Stigmatising low-income families
Judging people for eating foods that are accessible, affordable, and convenient — without understanding the context — deepens shame and inequality. Many are doing the best they can with the resources, time, and skills they have.
Losing sight of the foundation
Ultra-processed foods are one piece of the puzzle. The base of any supportive nutrition approach is still:
Enough energy (not constantly undereating or overeating).
A reasonable amount of protein.
Fibre from whole plants, where possible.
Fluid intake.
A pattern of eating that fits someone’s real life.
“Restricting ultra-processed foods won’t fix a life that feels unmanageable.”
So where does this leave us?
First, it is important to be honest: a diet heavily dominated by ultra-processed “junk” foods, especially when it sits alongside a mostly indoor, sedentary lifestyle, high stress, poor sleep, and very little routine, is a genuine risk to long-term health. Research repeatedly links high intakes of ultra-processed foods with increased rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and mental health concerns, particularly when they crowd out more nutrient-dense options from the diet. However, it is equally important to acknowledge that not all ultra-processed foods are created equal. Some products can be used strategically and may even support health in specific contexts. For example, a protein-rich yoghurt that helps an older adult meet their protein needs, or a higher-fibre cereal that supports better digestion and blood sugar control when other options are limited.
Whole, minimally processed foods still offer the most reliable foundation for long-term well-being. They tend to provide more fibre, vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients in their natural package, and there is robust evidence that eating patterns rich in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, pulses, nuts, and quality proteins protect against many chronic diseases. But that ideal also has to sit inside real lives, during a cost-of-living crisis, with exhausted parents, families who may not have access to a full kitchen, and individuals who simply do not have the time, money, or energy to cook every meal from scratch. When we ignore that reality, our advice becomes theoretical rather than supportive.
This is where flexibility and pragmatism become essential. Perfection is not required to make meaningful improvements. In practice, the goal is not to ban every packet, plastic pot, or frozen product from the home. Instead, the aim is to shift the overall diet balance gently. That might mean using some ultra-processed foods more deliberately. For instance, choosing higher-fibre cereals, yoghurts, or a tub of hummus that makes raw vegetables more appealing, while gradually reducing the frequency of clearly unhelpful “rubbish” foods, such as sugary drinks, sweets, and deep-fried snacks, eaten by habit rather than genuine enjoyment.
For many families, progress could also look like cooking very simple meals together when possible, even if it is just once or twice a week. Learning basic skills (e.g., how to prepare lentils, roast vegetables, or make a quick tomato sauce) can slowly build confidence and reduce reliance on takeaway foods. None of this has to be fancy or Instagram-worthy; it just needs to be repeatable and realistic. Alongside this, professionals and wider systems can support households in finding affordable, sustainable swaps, rather than pushing for an overnight transformation that is likely to collapse as soon as life becomes stressful again.
If we genuinely want people to thrive in the real world, our nutrition guidance must belong to the real world too. That means making room for nuance, compassion, and the very real financial, social, and emotional pressures people face — not only focusing on nutrients or labels in isolation. When advice respects both the science and the lived experience, people feel less judged and more empowered to take the next small step that is actually possible for them.
“If we genuinely want people to thrive in the real world, our nutrition guidance must belong to the real world too.”
A gentle question to end on:
Instead of asking, “Is this food ultra-processed or not?” a more helpful question might be, “Is this pattern of eating, in this life context, moving me closer to how I want to feel, or further away?”
That is the kind of conversation that actually changes lives.
Click the button below to find the answer to another important question.
References:
Casas, R. (2021). Moving towards a Healthier Dietary Pattern Free of Ultra-Processed Foods. Nutrients. 14(1), 118. doi:10.3390/nu14010118
Cordova, R. Viallon, V. Fontvieille, E. et al. (2023). Consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of multimorbidity of cancer and cardiometabolic diseases: A multinational cohort study. Lancet Regional Health Europe. 35, 100771. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100771
Fardet A. (2018). Characterization of the degree of food processing in relation with its health potential and effects. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 85, pp. 79-129. doi:10.1016/bs.afnr.2018.02.002
Hässig, A. Hartmann, C. Sánchez-Siles, L. et al. (2023). Perceived degree of food processing as a cue for perceived healthiness: The NOVA system mirrors consumers’ perceptions. Food Quality and Preference. 110(2):104944. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104944.
Lane, MM. Gamage, E. Du, S. et al. (2024). Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: Umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses. BMJ. 384, e077310. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077310
Monteiro, CA. (2009). Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing. Public Health Nutrition. 12(5), pp. 729-731. doi:10.1017/S1368980009005291
Pagliai, G. Dinu, M. Madarena, MP. et al. (2021). Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Nutrition. 125(3), pp. 308-318. doi:10.1017/S0007114520002688
Robinson, E. Johnstone, AM. (2024). Ultraprocessed food (UPF), health, and mechanistic uncertainty: What should we be advising the public to do about UPFs? PLoS Med. 21(10), e1004439. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004439
Sanchez, 0. (2025). Can UPFs Cause Metabolic Syndrome? Available at: https://www.nutrunity.com/updates/can-upfs-cause-metabolic-syndrome
Sanchez, O. (2025). Ultra-processed Foods: Overcoming Addiction. Available at: https://www.nutrunity.com/updates/upfs-addiction?rq=upf
Sanchez, O. (2025). From Gut Dysbiosis to Neurodegeneration: The Final Link in Obesity-Cognitive Difficulties. Available at: https://www.nutrunity.com/updates/final-link-in-obesity-cognitive-decline
Samhcez, O. (2025). The Long-Term Health Risks of Ultra-Processed Foods: How to Future-Proof Your Diet. Available at: https://www.nutrunity.com/updates/future-proof-your-diet?rq=upf
Sanchez, O. (2024). The Role of Food Additives in Leaky Gut and Autoimmune Disease. Available at: https://www.nutrunity.com/updates/food-additives-leaky-gut-and-autoimmune-disease?rq=upf
Sanchez, O. (2024). The Rising Cost of Healthy Eating: Is It Impacting Our Well-being? Available at: https://www.nutrunity.com/updates/the-rising-cost-of-healthy-eating-and-well-being
Sanchez, O. (2024). How Ultra-Processed Diets Disrupt Hunger Cues and Drive Overeating (And How to Fix It). Available at: https://www.nutrunity.com/updates/how-ultra-processed-diets-disrupt-hunger-cues-and-drive-overeating-and-how-to-fix-it?
Sanchez, O. (2024). Domino Effect of Ultra-Processed Diets – From Adipose Hyperplasia to Cognitive Decline. Available at: https://www.nutrunity.com/updates/impact-of-obesity
Soil association. (2025). Ultra-Processed Planet: The impact of ultra-processed diets on climate, nature and health (and what to do about it). Available at: https://www.soilassociation.org/media/24320/soilassociation_upf-scotland.pdf
Visioli, F. Marangoni, F. Fogliano, V. et al. (2023). The ultra-processed foods hypothesis: A product processed well beyond the basic ingredients in the package. Nutrition Research Reviews. 36(2), pp. 340-350. doi:10.1017/S0954422422000117
Vitale, M. Costabile, G. Testa, R. et al. (2024). Ultra-processed foods and human health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Advances in Nutrition. 15(1), 100121. doi:10.1016/j.advnut.2023.09.009